The Mau Mau uprising began in 1952 as a reaction to inequality and injustices in British-controlled Kenya. The response from the colonial administration was a brutal crackdown on the rebels, resulting in many deaths. By 1956, the uprising had effectively been crushed, but the scale of resistance to the British regime had been clearly demonstrated, and Kenya was set on a path toward independence, which was ultimately achieved in 1963.
Background
The British colonial presence in Kenya began in the late 19th century, as part of a broader trend of territorial seizure across the African continent by European nations, known as the Scramble for Africa. The region now known as Kenya had previously been under the control of the Sultan of Zanzibar, but pressure from Britain and its military forces compelled the Sultan to cede the territory to the British Empire, while the neighboring Tanganyika was handed over to Germany.
Agreements over the regions claimed by European powers were negotiated at the Berlin Conference of 1884–85, where the British were granted control over most of the East African coast. From around 1890, the British began moving inland, hoping to gain access to the fertile highlands and to strengthen security around Uganda, which had also been claimed as a British colony. To facilitate this, a railway line was constructed from Mombasa to Kisumu using Indian laborers, and British forces were deployed to suppress any resistance from the ethnic groups living in the central highlands—primarily the Maasai, Kikuyu, and Kamba.
The response from the indigenous African population was initially mixed—ranging from hostility to hospitality. However, British displays of power intended to intimidate the local population into submission—such as the arbitrary shooting of Africans—quickly led to the withdrawal of any initial welcome from those living in the interior.[i] While the Maasai generally avoided military confrontation with the British, the Kikuyu attempted to mount some resistance against the incursion of imperial forces into their lands. This resistance was met with brutality from the colonizers, who carried out executions and punitive expeditions to hunt down Kikuyu and Kamba people.
These actions were also carried out to elevate collaborators—Africans who were willing to work with the British—into positions of power.[ii] This pacification campaign, combined with the famine and disease that swept through the region during this period, resulted in significant loss of life and property among the indigenous population. An outbreak of rinderpest, a disease that severely affects livestock, contributed greatly to the devastation experienced by local communities.
The arrival of European settlers in 1903 further compounded the problems faced by the indigenous population. Although the number of white immigrants was relatively small, they laid claim to a disproportionately large amount of land, most of which was seized from Africans. A redistribution policy was implemented, expropriating fertile land from the local population to allocate it to white farmers, most of whom had come from Britain or South Africa.
This process marked the beginning of a pattern that would define the relationship between Europeans and native Kenyans throughout the first half of the 20th century. The Crown Lands Ordinance Act of 1915 stripped the indigenous people of their remaining land rights, completing a process that effectively transformed them into an agricultural proletariat, dispossessed of their own land. The influx of settlers increased significantly after the end of World War I, when the British government launched a scheme to settle many ex-soldiers in the region.
Continued land seizures to accommodate these settlers drove Africans to form organizations that campaigned for greater land rights for the indigenous population. These organizations included the East African Association (EAA), formed in 1921 but banned the following year, and the Kenya African Union (KAU), established in 1942.
After the end of World War II, dissatisfaction among African Kenyans was intensified by the lack of progress. Hundreds of thousands of Kenyans lived in poverty in the slums surrounding Nairobi, with little hope for employment or basic social justice. In contrast, most white Europeans and many of the Indians who had settled in Nairobi enjoyed conspicuous wealth and often treated indigenous Africans with hostility and disdain.[iii] A similar situation existed in rural areas, where 3,000 European families owned more land than the one million Kikuyu who had been forced into reserves.[iv] This situation—culminating from decades of abuse and oppression under British rule—created an atmosphere of discontent that fed into various Kenyan nationalist movements, eventually leading to the Mau Mau uprising.
Mau Mau appears
By the early 1950s, the younger and more radical elements of Kenya’s nationalist movement had begun to break away from those advocating for constitutional reform. These Africans were largely Kikuyu who had been reduced to squatters on their own ancestral land due to laws introduced by the British, and they were increasingly disillusioned with the conservative reform agenda supported by organizations such as the Kenya African Union (KAU).
Instead, they were prepared to resort to force to achieve their goals, and in the years leading up to the uprising, they carried out a series of small-scale attacks and acts of sabotage against European property.[v] These militant activists quickly managed to consolidate their support throughout the Kenyan highlands by launching an oath campaign to bind others to the anti-colonial cause. The movement that emerged became known as Mau Mau—the origin of the term remains unknown, as it is an ambiguous name to which many have attributed different meanings.
As the Mau Mau movement grew, more moderate elements among Kenyans were swept aside by popular pressure, with many branches of the Kenya African Union (KAU) adopting a more radical stance as a result.[vii] A central committee of Kikuyu activists in Nairobi loosely led the Mau Mau. Despite awareness of the movement’s growth, the government and settler communities made no concessions apart from a few symbolic gestures, and instead continued existing policies of repression—going so far as to propose new legislation to further curtail the rights of the indigenous population.
This inflexibility pushed Mau Mau into a period of armed resistance. The failure to acknowledge the threat posed by the squatter movement revealed how Europeans did not consider Kenyan nationalists capable of organizing significant resistance against the colonial regime.
Those initially targeted by Mau Mau were Kikuyu who collaborated with the Europeans. In 1952, a wave of violence was directed at African police witnesses who testified against other Africans, particularly in cases related to Mau Mau. Prominent collaborators were assassinated, and a small number of white settlers were also attacked.
The police responded by launching a mass campaign of arrests, detaining Kikuyu suspected of involvement with Mau Mau and placing others in preventive custody in an effort to neutralize the movement’s support base. However, this arbitrary repression had the opposite effect, driving many more indigenous Kenyans to support the movement. By mid-1952, around ninety percent of adult Kikuyu had taken the Mau Mau oath.
Kikuyu chiefs were encouraged by the government to speak out against Mau Mau and to administer “cleansing oaths,” which were purported to release Kenyans from the oaths they had taken in support of the anti-colonial cause. KAU officials, including Jomo Kenyatta, also publicly spoke out against the actions of the movement, although many stopped short of outright condemnation. In October 1952, Senior Chief Waruhiu—a prominent collaborator and the most vocal critic of Mau Mau among Kikuyu chiefs—was assassinated near Nairobi.
His death was met with celebration among Mau Mau supporters and alarm within the government. The administration finally recognized that Mau Mau posed a serious threat to colonial rule in Kenya, and the decision was made to actively confront and engage the rebels. Two weeks after Waruhiu’s assassination, the government declared a state of emergency.
The uprising
The state of emergency was accompanied by Operation Jock Scott, a coordinated police operation that arrested 187 Kikuyu whom the government identified as leaders of the Mau Mau movement. This included leaders of the Kenya African Union (KAU), but failed to capture many members of the Mau Mau central committee.
Alongside the deployment of British troops, it was hoped that these measures would be sufficient to disrupt and intimidate the rebels into submission. Mau Mau supporters responded by assassinating another senior Kikuyu chief and several white settlers. Thousands of Mau Mau fighters left their homes and set up camps in the forests of the Aberdares and Mount Kenya, establishing a base of resistance against the government. These fighters soon began to organize, and several military commanders emerged, including Waruhiu Itote and Dedan Kimathi. Hostilities remained relatively subdued for the rest of 1952, but the following year began with a wave of violent killings targeting European farmers and loyalist Africans.
This shocked the white population enough to demand that the government take stronger action against Mau Mau. As a result, the Kenyan security forces were placed under the command of the British army and began to encircle Mau Mau strongholds in the forests. This was accompanied by the large-scale eviction of Kikuyu squatters from lands earmarked for European settlers. Government forces adopted a policy of collective punishment, which was intended to undermine popular support for Mau Mau.
Under this policy, if a member of a village was found to be a Mau Mau supporter, the entire village was treated as such. This led to the eviction of many Kikuyu, who were forced to abandon their homes and possessions and were relocated to areas designated as Kikuyu reserves. A particularly disturbing element of the eviction policy was the use of concentration camps to process those suspected of Mau Mau involvement.
Abuse and torture were common in these camps, as British guards used beatings, sexual violence, and executions to extract information from detainees and to force them to renounce their loyalty to the anti-colonial cause. The process of mass eviction fueled anger and fear among the Kikuyu, who had already endured decades of land dispossession, driving hundreds of squatters to join the Mau Mau fighters in the forests.
The uprising escalated further on March 26, when Mau Mau fighters launched two major attacks. The first was an assault on the Naivasha police station, resulting in a humiliating defeat for the police and the release of 173 prisoners—many of them Mau Mau—from an adjacent detention camp.[xiv] The second was the Lari massacre of Kikuyu loyalists, in which at least 97 Kenyans were killed.
The incident was used by the government to further portray the Mau Mau as brutal savages, with no official acknowledgment of the comparable number of Mau Mau prisoners who had been shot dead by government troops in the Aberdare forest. These attacks marked the beginning of a pattern of Mau Mau raids on police and loyalists that continued throughout 1953. The gradual organization of the rebel forces in the forests led to the formation of military units, though they were limited by a lack of weapons, supplies, and training.
The Defeat of Mau Mau
A series of large-scale engagements between the two sides occurred throughout 1953, with the under-equipped Mau Mau forces suffering heavy casualties. By the end of the year, over 3,000 Mau Mau fighters had been confirmed killed, 1,000 captured (including Itote), and nearly 100,000 alleged Mau Mau supporters had been arrested. Despite these losses, Mau Mau continued to pose an effective challenge to the colonial regime, maintaining a campaign of attacks on settlers and collaborators—particularly in Nairobi, where the movement had a large, though largely clandestine, support base.
In early 1955, British forces began a series of sweeps through the forests in an attempt to flush out the remaining Mau Mau, who were now suffering from shortages of food and ammunition. This strategy had limited success in killing Mau Mau fighters—only a handful were eliminated—but their position had become weak enough that the constant disruption further depleted their strength. The government even ordered entire African populations in some districts—in one case as many as 70,000 people—to work their way through the forest and kill any Mau Mau they encountered.
By the end of the year, only an estimated 1,500 Mau Mau fighters remained in the forests, and they were in such poor condition that further organized military campaigns were no longer feasible. The following year, Kimathi—the most important of the remaining Mau Mau commanders—was captured and put on trial. The few remaining fighters were no longer capable of resisting the colonial regime in any meaningful way and were instead focused solely on survival.
This effectively marked the end of the Mau Mau uprising. British troops soon began to withdraw from Kenya, and although the state of emergency remained in place until 1960, there was little justification for it. According to official government figures, the number of Mau Mau killed was 11,503, though there is little doubt that the true number was significantly higher. In contrast, the number of white civilians killed by Mau Mau attacks—the basis for much of the British propaganda condemning the uprising—was only 32.
The Impact of Mau Mau on the Struggle for Independence
Despite the defeat of Mau Mau, the uprising had set Kenya on an irreversible path toward independence from colonial rule. There were several reasons for this. First, it became clear to the Kenyan population that the Europeans were far from invincible, and that their rule was more fragile than previously believed. As a result, the effective resistance to colonial authority demonstrated by Mau Mau accelerated the rise of nationalism in Kenya and across East Africa.
The actions of the white settler community revealed how deeply fearful they were of indigenous resistance to their land seizures, and divisions emerged between extremists and moderates, weakening the political dominance the community had previously enjoyed.[xxi] In addition, the brutality demonstrated by the government had the effect of fueling a new wave of anti-colonial sentiment throughout the country.
Also significant were the economic consequences of the Mau Mau uprising. The British were forced to spend an enormous amount of money to suppress the rebellion, and with the stagnant British economy still reeling from the effects of World War II, these expenses undoubtedly weakened Britain’s resolve to maintain its colonial ambitions in the face of such determined opposition. Additionally, the organized approach of Mau Mau and the challenges they posed to British forces directly undermined European claims that Kenyan nationalists were incapable of effectively challenging colonial rule.
Perhaps the most profound impact the Mau Mau uprising had on the struggle for Kenya’s independence was its role in politicizing and mobilizing the agricultural sectors, shaping their political awareness and economic thinking.[xxii] By awakening this key part of Kenyan society to the harm and oppression caused by colonial rule, Mau Mau sparked a popular movement for independence that captured the national consciousness of Kenya’s economically disenfranchised population like never before.
English (UK) 
Norsk bokmål 
Svenska 
Dansk 
Kiswahili 